The Law of Attraction: What It Is and What Science Says
Where the law of attraction came from, what it claims, which parts psychology supports and which it doesn't, plus how to use its best ideas without the downsides.
The law of attraction is the idea that your thoughts shape your reality: think positive thoughts and you’ll attract positive experiences, dwell on the negative and you’ll attract more of it. “Like attracts like.”
It’s the foundation of most modern manifestation practice, and the subject of millions of videos, books and posts. It’s also controversial. So what is it, where did it come from, and what does science actually say?
Where the law of attraction came from
The phrase is older than most people think.
- 19th century: the New Thought movement. Thinkers in the United States, influenced by healer Phineas Quimby, taught that the mind had power over health and circumstances.
- 1906: William Walker Atkinson published Thought Vibration, or the Law of Attraction in the Thought World, one of the first books built around the phrase.
- 1937: Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich popularized the idea that a burning desire, held in mind, would lead to wealth.
- 2006: Rhonda Byrne’s film and book The Secret brought the law of attraction to a mass audience, describing thoughts as magnets with “frequencies.”
Since then, it has spread across social media, through trends like Lucky Girl Syndrome, the 369 method and scripting.
What the law of attraction claims
Most versions share a few core claims:
- Thoughts carry energy or “vibrations.”
- The universe responds to that energy by sending back matching experiences.
- So if you feel as though you already have what you want, it will come to you.
What science doesn’t support
There’s no scientific evidence that thoughts emit vibrations that physically pull events, money or people toward you. Terms like “frequency” and “quantum” are borrowed from physics but don’t mean what they mean there.
The strong version of the idea also has a dark side. If good thoughts attract good things, then illness, poverty or tragedy must be the person’s fault for thinking wrongly. That’s not just unsupported, it’s cruel. Nobody attracts cancer, abuse or a pandemic with their thoughts.
What science does support
Strip away the cosmic language, and several parts of the law of attraction line up with solid psychology.
Expectations change behavior
In 1948, sociologist Robert Merton described the self-fulfilling prophecy: a belief that leads people to act in ways that make it come true. If you expect a job interview to go well, you may prepare more, speak more confidently and follow up, which makes a good outcome more likely.
Attention filters what you see
Your brain can’t process everything around you, so it filters. In the famous “invisible gorilla” experiment, about half the people asked to count basketball passes failed to notice a person in a gorilla suit walking through the scene. What you’re focused on shapes what you notice. Keep a goal in mind, and you’re more likely to spot the opportunities that fit it.
Optimism is linked to better coping
Research by Michael Scheier and Charles Carver found that optimistic people tend to cope more actively with problems and report better wellbeing. Optimism isn’t magic, but it changes how you respond to setbacks.
Belief in your ability matters
Albert Bandura’s research on self-efficacy, your belief that you can do what’s needed, found it’s one of the strongest predictors of whether people keep going when things get hard.
The twist: positive fantasies alone can backfire
Here’s where the popular law of attraction gets something important wrong. Psychologist Gabriele Oettingen found that people who only fantasized about an ideal outcome often made less progress toward it. Imagining success can feel so good that it saps the energy to pursue it.
What worked better was mental contrasting: picturing the goal and the obstacle in the way, then planning for it. We explain this in Does Manifestation Work?
How to use the law of attraction in a healthy way
Keep the parts that help, and drop the parts that don’t:
| Instead of | Try |
|---|---|
| “Think only positive thoughts.” | Notice negative thoughts without letting them run the show. |
| “Act as if you already have it.” | Picture the steps you’ll take to get it. |
| “Ignore obstacles; they lower your vibration.” | Name your main obstacle and make a plan for it. |
| “If it didn’t happen, you didn’t believe enough.” | If it didn’t happen, adjust the plan, not your self-worth. |
| “I am a millionaire.” | “I’m building skills and habits that grow my income.” |
Law of attraction affirmations that hold up
- What I focus on, I tend to notice. I choose to focus on possibilities.
- I’ve made good things happen before, and I can do it again.
- I take one step toward my goal every day.
- I’m open to opportunities I haven’t thought of yet.
- Setbacks are information, not verdicts.
- My actions turn my intentions into reality.
- I expect good things, and I prepare for hard ones.
- I’m allowed to want more for my life.
- I notice the progress I’m already making.
- I believe in my ability to learn what I need.
For a step-by-step method, read How to Manifest Something.
How Ananda can help
Ananda Manifest & Affirmation’s Manifestation mode writes affirmations that connect your goals to things you’ve already achieved. That keeps them believable and puts your attention exactly where the research says it should be: on what you can do next. It’s available in 70 languages, with read-aloud and a Home Screen widget.
Sources
- Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193–210.
- Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
- Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219–247.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
- Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1198–1212.